254 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
254 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
slido.com #QT24
|
|
|
|
"we want china to do well" - economically
|
|
### [How Global Enterprises are Getting Ready for Quantum Advantage ( and Role of Govt in that Journey)](https://connect-v3.jujama.com/Agenda/SessionDetails?id=326989#)
|
|
Aparna Prabhakar -
|
|
- government, derisk, and innovation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clena Abuan -
|
|
- regulation
|
|
- From McKinsey - when investments start to dip, government is hugely beneficial when private sector starts to get distracted.
|
|
- **Be part of the conversation**
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zachary Dutton
|
|
- For all of the use-cases, we make sure that we have a business sponsor
|
|
- none of that matters if you don't have an executive sponsor
|
|
- particularly important for quantum
|
|
- 2 kinds of people
|
|
- complete advocates
|
|
- believe it can do so many things
|
|
- thinks it solves every problem
|
|
- complete science fiction
|
|
- hardly believe it will be anything
|
|
-
|
|
- the only way to protect against that is to have an anchor that will pull against the wall
|
|
|
|
Philip
|
|
- Quantum sensing - near-term and get people to believe in quantum technology
|
|
- quantum computing is still a ways off
|
|
- but need to get people to believing in
|
|
- Roadmaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Q-Alchemy - the art of turning data into Quantum
|
|
|
|
Carsten Blank - CEO & Company
|
|
|
|
![[Pasted image 20240425154336.png]]
|
|
|
|
- [Q-Alchemy](https://q-alchemy.com)
|
|
- Free Access
|
|
- hosted in Germany
|
|
- QRAM for Quantum Computing is finally here
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Quantum Entanglement
|
|
- [low rank state preparation ](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.03132)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Chris Bishop
|
|
- Michele Moscow
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
WHY THERE NEEDS TO BE A QUANTUM APOLLO PROGRAM
|
|
|
|
By Bob Sutor
|
|
|
|
There needs to be a quantum leader that steps up.
|
|
Be it Linux Torvalds or the like.
|
|
We commit to doing this.
|
|
|
|
In 8 years from that, there was the spac program and man on the moon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three phases to the moon. - e
|
|
|
|
- first phase - Mercury
|
|
- First American **suborbital** flight
|
|
- started with redstrones
|
|
- 1958-1963
|
|
- we propose to accelerate the development of the appropriate lunar space craft
|
|
- First American orbital flight
|
|
- American "Lunar Supremacy"
|
|
|
|
|
|
- second phase - Gemini
|
|
- they had to figure out the space craft
|
|
- have to line it up perfectly
|
|
- how to start knocking off the options
|
|
- to how these options exist and we hav to start figuring out which work better and which dont
|
|
- Apollo - first lunar orbits
|
|
- Practical Lunar advantage - 1968
|
|
- very political time - stopped going to space for quite q while
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy but because they are hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practical Quantum advantage will occur when quantum and classical systems work together and perform s
|
|
|
|
- we can't say that at this point there is a winners
|
|
- modularity
|
|
- transduction
|
|
- quantum networking - one or more qubits and I want to move it over there
|
|
- the distance can be a few inches or a few miles
|
|
- if this doeesn't happen, any quantum computer that isn't able to network is dead in the water
|
|
- critical technologis for scaling
|
|
- requires public and private investment
|
|
- scaling to hundreds to thousands of logical qubits
|
|
- discovery andinvention of new modalitiees
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantum Computing Phase 3
|
|
(maybe 2030)
|
|
|
|
Practical Quantum Advantage - that can help on the
|
|
|
|
if you're a vendor you pull it in, if you're not a vendor you push it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I run an iphone
|
|
|
|
Full dominance ofuniversal quantum computing programming models.
|
|
|
|
New approaches to chemistry, physical simulation, QML, and optimization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
nISQ approached will be abandoned in the next decade.
|
|
|
|
Breaking encryption (maybe)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
What do wee need to do better?
|
|
|
|
Commit to top-down, long-term, coordinated leadership fundd by privatee and public investment with focused academic research
|
|
|
|
|
|
- build commrical quantum prime companies willin to subcontract to partner with, or acquire necssary componnt and supply chain companies
|
|
- you will begin to see name brands just investing in quantum
|
|
|
|
|
|
- invest sufficintly in technologies in 2,,6 ..years. avoiding duplicative investment in technologies and companies unlikely to survive in the long run
|
|
|
|
|
|
one quantum computer that can solve ea particular set of probleems - that's it and back up from therw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examplee start but neeeds work
|
|
- proposed U.S. Dfns Quantum Acceleration Act of 2024
|
|
- principle quantum advisor
|
|
- we must stop investing in overly duplicative first phas technologies and greatly increasee it for critical second phase modularity
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Womanium Quantum Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
- you can only go as far as you aim - Prachi
|
|
- the only thing that you can do is potentially contract work
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advancing
|
|
|
|
Gary Jones - PhD
|
|
Professors at two universities -
|
|
Patent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Geetha Senthi
|
|
- 95% of diseases are not addressed in the NIH
|
|
- we hope emerging technologies likee quantum can address these technologies
|
|
- Trans-NIH Working Group
|
|
- working closely with NIST
|
|
|
|
- quantum sensing NIH sbir grant
|
|
- research and training grants from NIH
|
|
- hope and promise presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Jones
|
|
- cyber security applications CZA
|
|
- CRQC - viewing it as a nuclear weapon
|
|
- harvested a lot of data now and can decrypt it
|
|
- reporting -
|
|
- no one knows when it's supposed to come
|
|
- they think 2030
|
|
- don't want to get caught on the 8ball on this
|
|
- PQC requirements
|
|
- Automated tooling to get information from each agency
|
|
- Reporting Flow Diagram
|
|
- cyberscope
|
|
- acdi tool development and integration
|
|
- looking at integrating zero-trust - and funding for quantum
|
|
- notional timeline to achieve the strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Questions -
|
|
|
|
1. To There are many vendors and are you willing for them to come to you
|
|
- Vendors interested in reaching out in cybersecurity,
|
|
- vendor engagement team at CZA
|
|
- willing to help and able to help
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2. To NIH - Are you willing to work with DARPA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ScaN - space, communications, and networking
|
|
- quantum plays a huge role for SCaN's future
|
|
- building a huge optical network to test what it can and can't do in space
|
|
- quantum communication is seen as the next step from optical
|
|
- planning at this stage is an academic exercise
|
|
- quantum sensing came up at the top of the list
|
|
- climate, o
|
|
- NASA, DoE, NSF, and NIS - national quantum initiative
|
|
- quantum AI is a veerey decisivee role
|
|
|
|
What advice would you give for insutries that hva to go through similar rpearations?
|
|
- take inventory first
|
|
- question how long the lifecycle of this can be expected for
|
|
- attend the NIH quantum -
|
|
|
|
Is panel excited about quantum computing, sensing, and quantum communications?
|
|
- good things that will quantum
|
|
- sensing, diamond-NV centers, real world examples
|
|
- quantum computing for accelerating drug discovery
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Quantum Initiatives Panel Discussion: Gloabl use cases of how goverenment, industry, and reseearchers are collaborating to drivee quantum innovation
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Celia - QED-C
|
|
- executive director of NQI - a community of 230 members around the world with 20 countries
|
|
- quantum industry and supply chain
|
|
- members are small suppliers of hardware
|
|
- we're very inclusive
|
|
- diverse benefits
|
|
- connections getting a job, getting a customer, getting collaborations
|
|
- Tim pryor - UK's National Physics Laboratory
|
|
- Kimberly McGee - Brookhaven national laboratory
|
|
- chief operations officer of C2QA
|
|
- 26 collaborations of industry, national labs, and universities
|
|
- hoping to contribute to the fundamental design of quantum computing ecosysteem
|
|
- Marcline
|
|
- senior scintist at FermiLab
|
|
- started with a piece of paper
|
|
- partners in Italy and UK - fermilab - single purpose national lab
|
|
- Tim Pryor - UK version of NIST,
|
|
-
|
|
- |